|
A
Headline We Missed
By
Jeff Alan - Staff Writer
Catchfence.com
05/25/2002
Buried
amongst the excitement, headlines and fallout from The Winston, I took
great interest in a story that your average NASCAR news-junkie would
have probably shunned. On the outside, it appeared innocuous. On the
inside, this story quietly sent shock waves through the suits at Bill
France Boulevard. Shock waves that reached as far as Madison Avenue.
NASCAR has been quiet about this, and with good reason.
This week, the Sports Business Journal, a clearinghouse for information
that 99.9% of the fans would have no interest in, chopped into those
numbers by reporting that teen and young adult men are either turning
off NASCAR on TV, or not tuning in at all. Anyway you look at it, this
could have enormous implications for the future of this sport.
First of all, we are dealing with a significant loss (or deficit) of
a viewing demographic that ranks as the single, most important target
for manufacturers and marketers; Adult males, 18-34. This is the group
that is most susceptible to change. Brand loyalty is traditionally established
during these years. Men typically marry and start families during this
time. Homes and domiciles are being established. Cars, houses, furniture,
food and beer are bought. Credit lines grow, bolstering buying power.
Lifestyles are pursued and cemented during these years. In short, this
is the age group that spends most of the money that flows via fiber
optic cables across our nation from one branch of the federal reserve
to another.
And these are the people most major advertisers want to reach.
But let us step back. Why isn't NASCAR appealing to males between 18-34?
What is NASCAR coverage lacking? Or, what is it about NASCAR that isn't
attracting these viewers in the first place?
Don't tell me those NASCAR commercials are ‘all over the place.' They
aren't. The only place where you really see many the spots that we all
love to watch, are broadcast during the races themselves. You have to
watch an awful lot of TV to be able to see more than one or two NASCAR
commercials on other networks. And will someone tell me how useful those
"how bad have you got it?" NASCAR promos are, when they broadcast them
only during a race? NASCAR should spend a few bucks buying time on major
networks and cable outlets to have those promos aired ---- where they
can reach and stimulate an audience that may be thirsting for excitement
in a televised sport.
And in a day and age of young rookies tearing up the tracks, and slowly
making their way into mainstream advertising, you would think that seeing
these young guns would provoke a group of guys to stay home and call
out for pizza and beer every Sunday afternoon. Just seeing those life-sized
cut-outs of Junior in just about every store that sells Bud should at
least increase awareness of the sport.
But this ‘problem' defies logic. In actuality, the aura, the danger,
and the excitement of stock car racing, is a perfect medium for young
to middle-aged males seeking a visual thrill. In fact, NASCAR has taken
great strides to attract and retain those prized 18-34 males. Look at
their presentations. Fifteen years ago, almost every NASCAR race telecast
or promo featured country or rockabilly music. Today, when a broadcast
opens, its heavy metal all the way. It shows the effort that NASCAR,
in conjunction with its broadcast partners, has made trying to shed
its image as a redneck sport dominated by funny talking southerners.
Part of that transformation includes the format in which it is presented
to the viewing public.
But what about the viewing habits of the 18-34 demographic as a whole?.
Why aren't men between 18-34 tuning in?
One colleague of mine suggested that young men are extremely mobile.
Weekends are respites from reality, he says, and activities often do
not include sitting on the couch on a Sunday afternoon watching racing.
My response to that is that those same 18-34 year old males that shun
auto racing have no problem sitting on the couch on a Sunday afternoon
watching the NFL all day, or seeing how many foul shots Shaq can miss.
The NFL has a surplus of 18-34 males who zero-in on the gridiron during
the winter months. Perhaps they may lend some to NASCAR?
I'll make a concession that young men, and especially young families,
are more apt to be outside the reach of the TV during the summer, when
family activities are more frequent. But the statistics already take
that into account. Those men between 18 and 34 that remain at home and
watch TV on Sunday are already factored-in to the equation. Fair being
fair, the latest numbers still look bad no matter how fast you spin
them.
Another possible reason is that NASCAR still does not get the headlines
and coverage that other sports receive from major sports publications.
Sports Illustrated, for instance, only gives NASCAR scant coverage on
its major races. And its safe to say that every high school and college
athlete or a sports fan reads SI weekly. When I was in school back in
the days of Robin Hood and Sherwood Forest, there was always a line
of jocks waiting their turn to read it. And now that ESPN isn't a member
of the NASCAR family, coverage there is almost nonexistent. I'll bet
if a copy of Winston-Cup Scene, or Stock Car Racing magazine were in
every high school and college library, you'd see a tremendous awareness
of the sport.
Admittedly, NASCAR has always been at a disadvantage merely because
of the nature of the sport. Stock Car Racing is a specialized, dangerous
and expensive sport. High School and College Phys Ed classes don't offer
auto racing as a part of the curriculum. Your local Lions Club does
not sponsor a little league stock car series at the community ballpark.
Kids don't race stock cars on their family driveways (although many
might race their family car on the back roads). Adult recreation leagues
give you the opportunity to play softball or tennis, but you'll never
be able to sign up to race modifieds on an asphalt oval.
In short, we are drawn by tradition and practicality to accept stick
and ball sports ---- baseball, football, soccer, and hockey ---- as
a normal part of our lives. Many will look at stock car racing as a
special sport that requires knowledge of it to enjoy. We already all
know the basics of a football game, the rules, and the aura of those
who play the game. We all know the intricacies of that sport. But your
average Joe would look at a race like the Daytona 500 as a bunch of
lunatics driving around in circles. And when we shake that mentality
from those that know no better, and NASCAR begins to weave its sport
into the fabric of our daily lives, and presents it so that it is as
normal to watch a stock car race as it would to watch the Super Bowl,
then you will see those viewing numbers change. And you will see NASCAR
grow faster then the expanding universe.
So what does all this mean to the fans? While it is doubtful that the
fans will be personally affected, it is not entirely impossible. But
if a team is about to fold because they don't have a sponsor, are losing
a sponsor, or a potential sponsor pulls out because they aren't happy
with the current or potential exposure of their target demographic,
then I can assure you a lot of good people will be affected. Perhaps
even your favorite driver. And that doesn't even count the apparel and
merchandise vendors who would be stuck with inventories of merchandise
that is, for all intents and purposes, outdated, and saleable only at
deep discounts. Finally, think of the TV broadcasters. Both FOX and
NBC lost staggering amounts of money last year. If an advertiser can
buy time on another network program that draws a larger segment of the
‘prime demographic,' then you can be sure that ad agency is going to
put their bucks where they make the loudest bang.
As you can see, this is a complicated problem that must breed an equally
complicated solution. And it is a problem that I can assure will be
addressed behind closed doors in the next few weeks. It has to be. If
NASCAR cannot find a way to attract more young men, it cannot possibly
grow in the long-term. And that is a most frightening prospect.
You can reach Jeff Alan at: Jalan5000a@aol.com
Reprinted
with permission from Jeff
Alan, Catchfence.com,
for educational use only. 2002
|
Read this editorial carefully. When finished, click
the "next page" button to read another editorial and then
you will be asked some questions about the editorials, which will
test your reading comprehension.
Do not scroll backwards to check your answer. You
will build better reading skills by concentrating on the content of
the editorial and what the author is trying
to convey to their readers.


|